|
|
|
There
are ideas here that could change the world.
— Prof.
Charles Derber, Boston College
![]() The
Simultaneous Policy: An Insider's Guide to Saving Humanity and the Planet
The greatest barrier to solving
our global environmental, economic and social problems is destructive competition
between nations to attract capital and jobs, harming society and the environment
around the world. The Simultaneous Policy offers a solution and
also outlines a political campaign which transcends party politics and
offers the prospect of global transformation and survival.
It's ambitious and provocative. Can it work? Certainly worth a serious try. Noam Chomsky
Polly Toynbee
The Guardian
Ed Mayo
Chief
Executive, National Consumer Council, UK
Helena Norberg-Hodge
Director of the International Society for Ecology & Culture
Jakob von
Uexkull
Founder and Chairman, Right Livelihood Award Foundation
Hazel Henderson
Author, Beyond Globalization: Shaping a Sustainable Global Economy
Prof. Charles
Derber
Dept. of Sociology, Boston College, MA, USA
Anne Spilling
Jounalist, Berkshire, UK
Tony Benn
Former Labour Member of Parliament, UK
Sir Richard Body
Former Conservative Member of Parliament, UK Published by: New European
Publications, 14-16 Carroun Road, London SW8 1JT, UK. Tel/Fax: +44 (0)20
7582 3996.
Price: £9.95 Paperback (£12.50 including postage & packing if ordered from ISPO) Copies available direct from: International Simultaneous
Policy Organisation, P.O. Box 26547, London SE3 7YT, UK. Please make
cheques payable to "ISPO". Payments can also be made via paypal.
All profits go to supporting the SP campaign.
International prices (including postage and packing): UK £12.50 USA $20.00 EU €23.00 (or equivalent in Eurozone currency) CH Sfr.36.00 AUS A$38.00 Denmark Dkr.170 Sweden Skr.210 Canada C$32.00 Japan ¥2200 NZ NZ$46.00 For prices in other currencies please contact us. Or available from bookshops. I agree with the case the International Simultaneous Policy Organisation (ISPO) is making about the failure of anti-globalization forces to propose effective alternatives to the status quo. I believe your organization's proposals are an important step forward. They address the real problems we face with proposals that deserve to be taken seriously. I hope that many of those who took important first steps in Seattle, Washington and Quebec City will now take the second step and take either the ISPO programme, or any alternatives they wish to propose, into the political arena. Anti-globalization demonstrators have the attention of the world. If they wish to hold that attention, and start to make an impact on policy, they must now follow the ISPO's lead and propose workable alternatives to the status quo. Prof. Christopher
Leo
Dept. of Politics, University of Winnipeg, Canada.
John McMurtry
Author, The Cancer Stage of Capitalism
Nicholas
Albery
Chairman – The Institute for Social Inventions, London
Moises Naim
Editor-in-Chief – Foreign Policy, USA
David Griffiths
Author of All This and Unemployment Too
Stephen Whiting
Quaker Peace and Service – London
Dr. Aidan
Rankin
New European (European Business Review) – UK
Jon Naar
Author, Design for a Livable Planet; Founder, The Solar Coalition
Simon Burall
Executive Director, One World Trust (in his personal capacity)
Richard St.
George
Director, the Schumacher Society (in his personal capacity)
Roger Doudna
International Programme Officer, Restore The Earth Project – Scotland
Shann Turnbull
Author, Democratizing the Wealth of Nations
Dr. Farhang
Sefidvash
Coordinator, the Research Centre for Global Governance, Brazil
Kavaljit
Singh
Author, A Citizen's Guide to the Globalization of Finance and Taming Global Financial Flows
Brian O'Leary,
Ph.D.
Author, Re-Inheriting the Earth, futurist, physicist, former NASA scientist-astronaut and expert on energy issues
Jackie Navarro
ATTAC – Québec, Canada
James Glyn
Ford
Member of the European Parliament
Emilio José
Chaves
Researcher in Economics and Sustainable Development
Dorothy Friedmann
Green Socialist Network – London
John Stewart
Author, Evolution's Arrow: the Direction of Evolution and the Future of Humanity
Suzanne Ismail
Economic Issues Programme Co-ordinator Quaker Peace & Service – London, UK
J.W. Smith
The Institute for Economic Democracy – USA
Godric Bader
Life President – Scott Bader Commonwealth Ltd.
Monday Wehere
Founder/President, the Wehere Foundation, Nigeria
Lucy Storrs
World Voices UK
Richard Stimson
Author, Playing with the Numbers: How So-called Experts Mislead Us about the Economy; ISPO National Coordinator, USA
Dominic Dibble
World Goodwill – London
Matthias
Hoepfl
Politische Oekologie, Munich, Germany
Nick Temple
The Institute for Social Inventions, London, UK
Svend Robinson
Member of Parliament, Canada
Allan Savory
Founder, Savory Center for Holistic Management
Syd Baumel
Editor, The Aquarian; Creative Director, ISPO
Sander Tideman
Founder, Spirit in Business
Elisabet
Sahtouris, Ph.D.
Author, EarthDance: Living Systems in Evolution
Alan D. Smith
Founder, MajorityVoice, USA
Juan de Castro
Director, Metaeconomics Research Center, Madrid and Commissioner, State of the World Forum's Commission on Globalization
Taylor Holst
Founder, Australian Humanitarian Award
Kerri Smith
Activist and adult educator, Australia
Tim Hart
Management and Personnel Consultant, UK
Tracy, Marchioness
of Worcester
Associate Director ISEC; Patron of Gaia Foundation, Transport 2000 and the Soil Association
Personal Statement
Chaos Emptiness or More Chaos? The Golden Merry-go-Round Global Market "Dictatorship" Pseudo-Democracy supplants Democracy Political Leaders Global Simultaneous Implementation: Fantasy or Necessity?
The Nation State The European Union Fighting over Sandwiches The Need for Leadership
Aims Scope Measures Principles From Theory to Practice
Overcoming Funding from Big Business Third Party Adoption Adoption by Main Centre-Left Parties Two-Party Democracies SP and Gaining Public Support
Adoption by Non-Industrialised Countries Reassurance and Setting an Example
SP: Change Measures SP and Benefits for Business SP and Benefits for Politicians SP and Benefits for the Public Campaigning and Spiritual Values Campaigning Methods and Strategy
Environmentalism or Ecologism? Pricing the Environment Charitable Status
The principal barrier to implementation of any significant measure to improve today's environmental, economic or social problems, be they in advanced, developing or non-industrialised countries, is destructive competition. Global de-regulated capital flows and corporations know no national boundaries and by their ability or threat to move elsewhere, force nations to compete with one another for capital, jobs (and therefore votes) and ever scarcer natural resources. With increased government reliance on capital markets to finance public deficits and on corporations to maintain employment, internationally mobile capital effectively precludes the implementation of any national policy that might incur market or corporate displeasure. The markets have consequently engineered strong leverage over the economic, social and environmental policies adopted by any country ensuring that only market-friendly, neo-liberal policies are pursued — regardless of the party in power . The result is the strangle-hold of pseudo-democracy in which, whatever party we elect, the policies delivered remain substantially the same. Since virtually all nations are part of an increasingly integrated global economy, they are all subject to the same strangle-hold. In advanced countries, it is exerted directly by the market itself, ably assisted by the WTO; in developing countries, by the market and through "structural adjustment" imposed by the IMF or the World Bank; in non-industrialised countries by the virtual absence of any foreign direct investment leaving them to the consequences of warfare, poverty, disease, increasing numbers of refugees and so on. No nation can exit from this predicament by seeking to re-regulate financial markets because such action would cause capital flight, devaluation and inflation if not outright economic collapse. Similarly, policies that seek to address environmental or social problems requiring higher public spending or higher costs for industry are precluded on the grounds of uncompetitiveness, adverse market reaction and the threat of job losses. In de-regulating capital markets, nations have therefore unleashed a force they can no longer unilaterally control – a global competitive merry-go-round now spinning so fast that no nation can get off (unless it is forcibly ejected by the market itself). This paper therefore argues, firstly, that politics – regardless of the party in power – has effectively been paralysed into a market-friendly position from which it cannot escape. Secondly it argues that fundamental changes to the capitalist system are essential before there can be any hope of closing the 'sustainability gap' or of expecting any tangible results from international agreements on reduced emissions. Thirdly, since capitalism can only be changed and controlled by politics — which has itself already been paralysed — we are heading for environmental, economic or social collapse without the means to alter that course. Solutions that fail to address the central barrier to reform that global free markets and international competition represent are therefore effectively dead in the water. In spite of this state of affairs, this book sets out a feasible means not only of regaining control of global financial markets and corporations, but of going much further towards creating the conditions for a global society and economy more compatible with Nature and the needs of human nature. The disturbing growth of far-right political parties is a sure sign that failure to do so could well prove catastrophic. This book therefore argues that a fundamental transformation from international competition to global cooperation is required, for only through global co-operation between nation states can destructive competition be eliminated and meaningful changes implemented. Crucially, it also sets out a practical method of achieving this. It therefore represents something of a "missing link" without which the many solutions now being proposed by leading economists and ecologists are likely to remain confined largely to theory. To break the vicious circle of global competition, both between nations and between corporations, all nations need to act simultaneously by implementing the Simultaneous Policy (SP); a range of measures to re-regulate global markets and corporations in order to restore genuine democracy, environmental protection and peace around the world. SP thus calls upon peoples all over the world to recognise the futility of conventional party politics and to unite both by taking policy out of the hands of politicians and, by force of their numbers and their votes, by bringing political parties into competition with one another to adopt SP. By separating the adoption of SP from its implementation, SP transcends party-political differences and allows voters, NGOs, politicians and governments to adopt it without risking their respective personal or national interests. It therefore represents political action of a kind not yet seen: a New Politics of cooperation and community which transcends both the divisions of conventional party politics and the dilemmas of maintaining international competitiveness. SP thus offers a real prospect – perhaps the only prospect – of beneficial change and survival. This New Politics has profound implications for North-South relations, the global environment, world economics, global governance, Green parties, non-governmental organisations, international relations, national domestic politics and, not least, for the triumph of the human spirit. John Bunzl – March 2001. Published in "Fourth World
Review" and in "New European"
Bunzl's interest in economic and political reform began when he read E.F. Schumacher's Small is Beautiful, which he (rightly) regards as being as valid today as it was in 1974, when it was written. Schumacher called for a return to a human scale in the organisation of politics and economics. He articulated a growing nervousness about the growing centralisation of power, and in economic growth as an end in itself. For Bunzl, Schumacher's predictions of environmental degradation and the collapse of shared values have been more than realised. Far from bringing peoples and nations together, the end of the Cold War has intensified economic competition. It has removed from international capitalists the moral obligation to behave humanely and the pragmatic desire to do so. More than that, the fall of communism has been accompanied by the triumph of neo-liberalism. As mechanistic as 'vulgar' Marxism, this ideology places the market and economic growth above considerations of equity and or the need to preserve settled communities. Neo-liberalism's dialectic of change is global in scope and scorns local traditions, peculiarities or needs. The World Trade Organisation, the International Monetary Fund and other neo-liberal bastions impose their will increasingly on governments, North and South. In this sense, the old anarchist slogan is coming true: 'Whichever way you vote, the government always gets in'. Only now these governments are minimalist in social policy and tied to a free-market agenda. The idea of a 'simultaneous policy' came to Bunzl when he looked at Europe's Green parties, admired their opposition to unprincipled, unplanned 'growth' but realised that they were impotent. Impotent because of, rather than despite, their growing electoral strength, since politics today mean compromise with corporate power, not the ability to change things. Resistance to globalisation has been fragmented, fissiparous and unstructured. Often, it is manipulated by violent extremists, as we have seen most recently with the 'May Day protests' in London. Many opponents of globalisation call themselves anarchists, reviving the [conveniently] untested philosophies of Bakunin, Proudhon and Kropotkin. Yet the system they oppose represents the unacceptable face of anarchy — the 'anarchy of production', as Marx called it, plus the breakdown of a coherent moral order. Bunzl realises that globalisation requires global solutions. A change of course requires nations to act together, much as they did when the United Nations was formed half a century ago, but at a much more profound level. If national governments cannot 're-regulate' business, a coalition of nation states, North and South, can do so. In Simultaneous Policy, Bunzl draws up a three-stage plan for social and political reform. Measures range from, in the first instance, the dismantling and banning of nuclear weapons, the banning of political funding by big business, working towards a series of 'change measures to transform major corporations and institutions into ones that are more compatible with a healthy society and environment'. Bunzl is not an 'anti-capitalist', like those who demonstrate on Western streets. Like the real (as opposed to simplified) Adam Smith, he wants individual enterprise to serve human need. Like Herman Daly, pioneer of the 'steady state' (or balanced) economy, he wants economics to be returned to its origins as a branch of moral philosophy. Economic systems, including markets, are man-made, and so it is nonsense to argue that we cannot control them. The virtue of Bunzl's monograph is that it combines healthy idealism with a good dose of practical wisdom. His conditions for cancelling Third World debt are quite stringent, allowing plutocratic elites no room for manoeuvre. His work should be therefore be required reading for Robin Cook, Clare Short and Madeleine Albright (or whoever succeeds her). Bunzl is, I feel, the first writer on the 'sustainable society' to advance beyond rhetoric and grapple with the problem of how such a society might be achieved. He is aware that, as in so much else in life, the starting point must be the individual human being. This means that his intense political engagement is tempered by a sense that the underlying problem is moral and spiritual, not political. I feel that the 'simultaneous policy' idea is only beginning to take shape, and so there is far more to come from Bunzl. As such, I commend his work to our readers. Other book reviews have appeared in the following publications and are also available. Contact jbunzl@simpol.org for details: Resurgence
:
by John Coleman
All these available in English only. Other reviews not so far published to our knowledge have been written by: Richard Stimson. |
INTRODUCING
the
ISPO Making It Happen Series The International Simultaneous Policy Organisation is pleased to launch the first book in its Making it Happen Series: Monetary Reform — Making it Happen! In each of the compact, accessible volumes of the series, ISPO Founder John Bunzl teams up with a different internationally prominent expert to show how the Simultaneous Policy (SP) can stimulate global reform in a vital policy area. Each book also provides practical tools that readers can use to accelerate the implementation of SP worldwide. Next in the series: Integral Global
Governance – Making it Happen!
Anticipated publication time: Spring 2006.
By James Robertson and John M Bunzl Published by the International
Simultaneous Policy Organisation, London, 2004
A brilliant treatment of a question which has never been so urgent. George Monbiot
Synopsis Pressures for a new political economy are becoming stronger as worldwide protest against the present form of globalisation and anxiety about American 'imperialism' continue to grow. The new political economy will need to combine economic efficiency to meet human needs with social justice and environmental sustainability. It will require changes in our institutions, particularly those concerned with money and finance. Monetary Reform: Making it Happen! explores an international solution to this economic challenge that would link two proposals that have come forward in Britain during the past three years. One is for monetary reform as proposed by Joseph Huber and James Robertson in 2000. The other is for Simultaneous Policy, as proposed by John Bunzl in 2001. Praise for Monetary ReformI’m happy to see two good ideas merge into a single strategy. Bernard Lietaer, author,
The
Future of Money
Hazel Henderson, author
of Beyond Globalization and other books, and partner with the Calvert
Group of socially responsible mutual funds in the USA in creating the Calvert-Henderson
Quality of Life Indicators
Margaret Legum, Chair
of the Trustees of the South African New Economics network.
Pat Conaty, Senior
Research Associate, New Economics Foundation.
Herbert Girardet,
Chairman of Schumacher Society, UK.
Colin Hines, author,
Localization:
A Global Manifesto
George Monbiot, author,
The
Age of Consent
Richard Douthwaite,
author, The Growth Illusion, Founder, Feasta
Margrit Kennedy, author,
Interest
and Inflation Free Money
from the SUMMARY The first two chapters on monetary reform are by James Robertson. Although much of the detail in them refers to Britain, the same outline applies broadly to other countries too. The historical perspective in Chapter 1 brings out some of the parallels between the aims of monetary reform in the 19th century and now, and some of the differences between that time and ours. It suggests that the historical evolution of the monetary system between then and now points to the Huber/Robertson proposal as the next step forward. It also points out that a key difference between then and now is that monetary reform must be dealt with today in an international context. Another difference is that now public awareness is becoming widespread that big changes in the monetary and financial system are needed. People's aspirations for a greener, juster, more people-centred way of life, a new direction of more peaceful progress, and a new consciousness about our place in the planet, are growing. But recognition is also growing that those aspirations cannot be fulfilled, so long as the perverse incentives and compulsions of the present money system shape how we actually live. Chapter 2 summarises the proposal for monetary reform published in Creating New Money, and brings out its international as well as its national significance. It notes some of the main obstacles to it that have become apparent and some of the objections that have been made to it, including those based on the risk of damage to a national economy's international competitiveness. Chapter 3 is written by John Bunzl. It introduces the Simultaneous Policy approach and explains its potential relevance to monetary reform proposals such as Creating New Money, as well as to other reforms advocated by global justice campaigners and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). It outlines in more detail the obstacles to the implementation of monetary reform likely to arise from the reaction of global markets, and it explains how Simultaneous Policy could potentially overcome them. Specific arguments in favour of the Simultaneous Policy approach are discussed as well as its potential disadvantages and responses to them. Chapter 4 re-emphasises the importance of an international campaign for monetary reform. It will probably be based initially on non-governmental organisations (NGOs) mobilising citizens' interests worldwide, bringing in small businesses and other sectors inadequately served by the present money system, and then spreading to growing numbers of mainstream politicians, political parties, government officials, financial experts and economists. That chapter and the Briefing conclude with some practical suggestions about what can be done to promote monetary reform by its supporters
Monetary Reform: Making it Happen! will be published January 1, 2004. ISBN: 0-9546727-0-4. Copies can be ordered in advance from ISPO (see below). Also available from bookstores. Price: £5.00 Paperback (£6.00 including postage & packing.) For international prices, contact ISPO. All of John Bunzl's royalties will be donated to the SP campaign. Please make cheque payable
to "ISPO" and mail to:
Payments can also be made via paypal. REVIEW Monetary Reform — Making It Happen! By James Robertson and John Bunzl Reviewed by Susana Piohtee In the tradition of the ‘Teach Yourself’ and ‘How To’ books of the 1950s and 60s, this first of a proposed series of co-authored handbooks, ISPO – Making It Happen, provides enough information about its topic for the reader to ‘take matters further’ should they so wish. The concept of using the Simultaneous Policy (SP) internationally ‘to make things happen’ provides the thread that will run through all the books in the series. Each book will focus upon a specific topic. In this first of the series the subject under scrutiny is Monetary Reform. Between them, the authors have a profound knowledge of, and solid practical background in banking, government and commerce. Both men are pragmatic visionaries, willing to lay themselves on the line in order to bring about radical change that whilst essential to the survival of humanity, is hugely challenging to the perceived wisdom of today’s mainstream economic thinking, and evokes vociferous and powerful objection from those with vested interests in the current status quo. The first part of the book gives a brief history of our current monetary system. It shows why Monetary Reform is needed, and how proposed reforms will result in ‘money serving the people instead of vice versa’ and thus beneficially change the lives of billions of people worldwide. The second part of the book explains how a breathtakingly simple yet visionary concept called ‘the Simultaneous Policy’ (SP) has the potential to ‘make this happen’ by enabling each one of us to use our vote to transcend party politics and challenge the lobby power of multinational corporations; even take on the might of the US dollar. Refreshingly, this is not a ‘they’re wrong, we’re right’ book, but one of an increasing genre of writing that whilst acknowledging mistakes made and the very real challenges of overcoming these, talks the reader through a series of practical actions that have the potential for resolving the hitherto apparently intractable and destructive consequences of these mistakes. Objections to SP are dealt with sympathetically, yet demolished one by one. By the time we reach the last chapter, we begin to realise that what we are being offered is a chance to contribute to a truly democratic process and lead our government …… rather than the other way round! Given the Life-threatening activities of most national governments at this time, how can we not take up this opportunity! Monetary Reform is not most people’s idea of a sexy topic! Perhaps this is why so many of us remain in woeful ignorance of the simple facts about the manner in which money is created today. And perhaps it also explains why a non-accountable, profit-making Banking Community defining national and global indicators for economic success has remained virtually unchallenged, except by a handful of campaigners, for so long. Hopefully this handbook will contribute to changing all that! For me as the two most significant monetary reform concepts to emerge were:
It also becomes clear how these mechanisms of money creation inevitably undermine the work of those various NGOs and other charitable organisations, often referred to as The Global Justice Movement, by making the social and environmental reforms they support and campaign for ‘too expensive’ to sustain. James Robertson argues the case for monetary reform well whilst acknowledging the huge challenge achieving this presents given today’s global economic interdependence. In the third chapter of the book he hands over to John Bunzl to explain how the Simultaneous Policy (SP) would hugely increase the chances of success. John Bunzl, the man behind the Simultaneous Policy (SP) is nothing if not a man of courage. To go public with a concept that initially appears totally outrageous -- challenging not only long established political and economic procedures, but the might of the International Banking Community as well -- requires courage and faith. Chapter Three details the simple but ingenious step-by-step SP methodology by which citizens can use our political vote with clout! The distinction between the adoption of SP (i.e., embracing the principle) and its implementation, are explained, making it clear that adopting SP does not exclude following individual activities; but provides the means for organisations to co-operate and support each other while continuing their own campaigns. As the author says, this should appeal to people across the political spectrum, whether committed Party members, protest or tactical voters, or one of the huge number of individuals whose alienation from our whole political system is such that they cannot see the point of voting at all. By becoming SP adopters an individual would no longer be faced with the only option of using his/her vote to support one or another Political Party — with all the accompanying baggage of adversarial win/lose outcomes inherent to ‘Party’ politics. By becoming SP adopters we can encourage all politicians / candidates, their parties, and thus governments to adopt SP themselves by pledging to implement SP reforms and policies. What a brilliant idea! How can it not hold appeal for all who desire to improve the effectiveness of our so-called democratic processes? We are shown how SP would only be needed to enable national governments to implement policies that though highly necessary for global welfare would, due to ‘free’ market competition, have a very real negative impact upon the ‘first-mover’ country if implemented unilaterally; but which if implemented simultaneously by a sufficient number of countries would go a long way towards bringing to a halt the economic insanity that has already plunged humanity into self-destruct mode. An important distinction between SP and political activity that attempts to force governments into reform is that SP facilitates positive change by removing this risk to national governments of first-mover disadvantage. It allows each government – or governing body — to continue implementing current policies until such time as enough consensus has been built up nationally and globally through the adoption of SP to make the popularly desired reform a politically viable choice. Although SP tactics can only work directly within nations in which citizens have the vote, an indirect affect will be felt by non-democratic nations via pressure from trade partner nations. John Bunzl describes the SP process as ‘a strategy for building consensus for the future’. Whilst the actual detail of the policies SP is to consist of could, if members so decide, be formulated by expert and independent policy makers, they will be determined by, or at least consented to, by the citizen members of the International Simultaneous Policy Organisation (ISPO) themselves, not dictated by politicians, or global business institutions. As well as presenting very persuasive arguments in favour of SP, its founder doesn’t hesitate to acknowledge and respond to the many arguments against it. He recognises some to be realistic and others to be phoney objections used to protect the advantage of those with vested interests in maintaining the status quo. He comments that though SP is not a political reform in itself but a practical took for facilitating the democratisation of our current political procedures; it is a process that would likely enough of itself lead to political reform. It struck me that the initials of The International Simultaneous Policy Organisation, ‘ISPO,’ can just as easily stand for ‘IS Possible’! From reading between the lines it seems that ISPO has arisen from a combination of what A Course in Miracles calls ‘miracle mindedness’ (the ‘knowing’ that recognises the inherent goodwill and desire for right human relations within each human being), and the ‘can do’ thinking beloved of today’s Management Gurus. Its approach would appear to be the first ever ‘bottom-up’ consultation and decision-making process that cannot be stymied by greedy shareholders or company director, incompetent middle management, or controlling ‘leaders’.. The gift of SP is that it offers ordinary concerned people who have no powerful connections or strings to pull, the opportunity to be instrumental in bringing about a major transformation of the human condition. It is clear that SP’s success as a tool for transformation depends upon enough people (‘enough’ does not mean vast numbers) becoming SP adopters. The responsibility for making this democratic process work, well and truly lies with each one of us. We are being offered the chance to practise right human relations in action, and the ending to this story will be written by you and me. Given humanity’s current lemming-like flight into oblivion, John Bunzl’s comment that SP is ‘not unrealistic when seen as a developing process against the backdrop of a seriously deteriorating world situation’ is perhaps a mild understatement. Susana Piohtee is a psychotherapist specialising in personal and organisational growth and community facilitation. She currently works with a Housing Association and its tenants to tackle and prevent anti-social behaviour and community conflict. She describes herself as a “systems buster”; a remover of barriers and builder of bridges and as a co-learner and traveller who aims for the re-cognition of the divinity within humanity. |