It’s Simpol!
The Simultaneous Policy News
2004 – issue #1

An occasional newsletter (successor to ShiP Ahoy!) from the
INTERNATIONAL SIMULTANEOUS POLICY ORGANISATION (ISPO)
PO Box 26547, London SE3 7YT / www.simpol.org / info@simpol.org

Edited by Brian Wills (brian.wills@wanadoo.fr


Encouraging endorsements of the SP idea may keep on coming …

This from Keith Wilde in Canada (keithwilde@sympatico.ca), in comments about Monetary Reform by James Robertson and John Bunzl (2003): 

I am not a joiner. I do put my energy and whatever knowledge I possess into individual projects, but I cannot recall ever having given full intellectual consent and commitment to a political or ideological campaign since the age of 25.  Nevertheless, I plan to photocopy the back page of this book and sign up as a supporter of the International Simultaneous Policy Organization, which seems to me to be a brilliant and virtually unexceptionable approach to reforms of all the kinds which I and others with whom I share a degree of commonality have given much energy to promoting.  And in a review of the same booklet by Susana Piohtee (spring@sorse.freeserve.co.uk) she writes:  It struck me that the initials of The International Simultaneous Policy Organisation, ‘ISPO,’ can just as easily stand for ‘IS POssible’! … Its approach would appear to be the first ever ‘bottom-up’ consultation and decision-making process that cannot be stymied by greedy shareholders or company directors, incompetent middle management, or controlling ‘leaders’…  The gift of SP is that it offers ordinary concerned people who have no powerful connections or strings to pull, the opportunity to be instrumental in bringing about a major transformation of the human condition. And Barbara Marx Hubbard (bmh@peaceroom.org), founder of the Foundation for Conscious Evolution http://www.evolve.org, recently wrote these sentences to John Bunzl:  I am so delighted to read your rationale for the Simultaneous Policy initiative. It is brilliant and corresponds to the deepest understanding of evolutionary design which has motivated us in developing Evolve.org, and in fact my whole life's work. Yours is the first social initiative I have found which actually offers a political mechanism to further the evolutionary imperative for greater cooperation at the large-scale level. … but what can campaigning adopters do to help increase SP’s public profile?

Syd Baumel in Canada (baumel@mts.net) thought that Arundhati Roy’s article on ‘The New American Century’ in the 9 Feb 04 issue of The Nation offered an excellent opportunity to tell readers of this well known liberal US magazine about the relevance of the Simultaneous Policy to the thread of her text. So he circulated drafts of a Letter to the Editor for comment among SP colleagues, and sent this final version signed jointly with Dick Stimson as National Coordinator, USA, and John Bunzl as Founder and Director: 

The Simultaneous Policy Salt March

We couldn't agree more with Arundhati Roy's plea for the global justice movement to mount a new Gandhian "salt march" against the American-led empire of corporate globalization. 

But why limit ourselves to resistance? In any legitimately democratic world order, it is we the people who are the rightful sovereigns. Our challenge is to apply the immense power of our numbers to claim that sovereignty. We believe the Simultaneous Policy (SP) is a uniquely potent strategy to peacefully achieve that goal.

Roughly 60 percent of the world's citizens have the right to vote, and the number is steadily rising. SP is an emerging global "legislature" and voting bloc that enables us to use these general election votes to drive our national governments to adopt and eventually implement our global justice policy platform, simultaneously and worldwide. It is a democratic strategy to globalize our common human values.

As far as salt marches go, SP will likely be a long and slow one, complementary to more focused and rapid marches like the one suggested by Roy. But when we get to the ocean, we will have changed the system itself. Please join the long march at www.simpol.org

Too bad The Nation editor ignored the letter. Why? Perhaps because the specific plug for SP was inconsistent with editorial guidelines. But a later effort was more successful – this time in the form of an article. Syd reported at the end of March that a piece on SP he wrote for the Washington Free Press a few months ago has now been posted on their website at http://www.washingtonfreepress.org/67/votingYourGlobalConscience.htm and has been copied to ISPO’s website, too. The title is "Voting Your Global Conscience: The Simultaneous Policy offers an ingenious scheme to take back the world." Here are beginning and end extracts of this professionally written interpretation of the SP message (well worth looking at if you are searching for new ways in which to tell friends what SP is all about): "This is brilliant! I haven't been so excited since fifth grade when I learned that the UN was starting," says Seattle animal activist Nancy Pennington. It "has caught my attention and passion like no other movement before," exclaims Australian political activist Kerri Smith. Brazilian academic Farhang Sefidvash describes it as "a wonderful way of implementing cooperation, which is the new law of human survival in the globalized world." … "It took a long time to sink in. This is not a quick bite," says Eileen Weintraub, a Seattle animal advocate who coordinates the movement's modest Northwest contingent. "It's hard to convince others of its worth in a few words." …

For Weintraub, SP is heir to Seattle. "I came to SP as a way for Seattle folks to enter the global dialogue they started during the WTO '99 protests. Powerful and transformative ideas are beginning to be shared the world over." SP, she thinks, could turn those ideas into reality.

We all know what consensus means. But how effective is it for decision-making in ISPO?

This is an important question because we interact as volunteers via email without formal decision-making procedures. 

Early adopters may remember we proposed that people who felt strongly on particular issues should function as email discussion moderators, so that exchanges could be guided through to an agreed conclusion under the tutelage of a well informed adopter. 

But – no surprise – it didn’t work out, perhaps because potential moderators were hesitant to chair ISPO-wide exchanges ‘unofficially’. The situation changed late in 2002 when John Bunzl selected a dozen adopters to form the Governance Taskforce. Its job was to function as a chaired email committee to debate key ISPO organisational issues and make recommendations for approval by adopters. 

They tested out voting and consensus ways of arriving at agreement, and soon discovered just how different an email committee is from a conventional one sitting around a table. If there are no facial expressions, or silences or body language, how does the chairperson decide whether a point must be decided by vote, or whether sufficient consensus has emerged so that s/he can dictate an agreed minute for the secretary? 

In the end the Taskforce found a no-objection consensus procedure worked best. Ideas were proposed, debated, modified, and then finally agreed when it was clear no further divergent emails could be expected. But – no surprise again, perhaps – in the end the really hard work of drafting the ISPO Founding Declarations clause by clause was delegated to a small sub-committee, occasionally meeting in person to speed things along. And in turn, as readers of this newsletter will know, these were circulated for endorsement by all adopters following the same no-objection consensus principle.

So has this set a precedent for ISPO? Probably yes – because, as these two interesting examples suggest, we seem to feel comfortable working with each other in this way.

How, for instance, should the title of this ISPO newsletter be chosen? Your editor trawled the simpol listserve for suggestions, asking if the original ShiP Ahoy! or its successor It’s Simpol! should be retained, or whether there were alternatives on offer. The response was surprisingly inventive. Up came SPress, graSP, SPrint!, SPin, News SPecial, SPring is Coming, Simply Profound, Shifting Paradigms, and, for fun, Simply Potty – followed, of course, by comments favouring this or that choice, including warnings about overlaps with existing titles.

So what did your editor do? He assessed the feedback, checked same-title entries on internet, and concluded that It’s Simpol! had won on points – naturally on the understanding that nothing is immutable in this world, and that this title may evolve into something different sometime in the future. 

And here’s another example. A Flash script has been proposed as an overdue addition to the ISPO website. Pros and cons have been debated by several pundits who know about these things, following an offer of guidance from a professional animator at a knock-down fee. (That’s how things have to work, of course, if you don’t have cash in the bank.) 

Anyway, now that a few scenarios have surfaced for discussion, the protagonists are exchanging opinions. Here’s a recent extract in which Robin Paris (robin@robinparis.co.uk) responds to ideas from Syd Baumel (baumel@mts.net):

Whilst not wanting to say your suggestion and follow-ups from others are wrong or lousy or anything worse, I would like to make some points starting from another angle: that of animation and what makes it work... meaning, people enjoy it, people respond to it (emotionally and physically), and people recommend it to others. So the debate continues … until energy, free time and other essential inputs will coalesce in ISPO style into an approved finished product. Or, sadly, the project will go onto the back-burner until there are sufficient funds to finance it.

Either way, what do these learning processes tell us? Helen Barber, Simpol-UK’s legal adviser who specialises in cooperative law, perhaps has the answer. She has spelt out in one of the incorporation Articles that "questions arising at any meeting shall be decided by consensus" (with majority voting as a sole alternative). So has the time now come to say – whether it’s face-to-face around a table or collectively in front of our computer screens – consensus rules, okay? 

Brief notices and campaigning roundup

§ John Bunzl (jbunzl@simpol.org) wrote and circulated an article on Why Forgiving Ourselves and Each Other is the Path to Social Justice on 13 Jan. This prompted Miles Litvinoff, General Manager, One World International Foundation, London (miles.litvinoff@oneworld.net) to adopt SP and to invite Simpol-UK to become a partner of One World ("a community of 1500 civil society partners worldwide": www.oneworld.net). 

§ Final versions of the Founding Declarations for ISPO (global) and Simpol-UK (as a model for other national SP organisations) were circulated to SP adopters worldwide by John Bunzl on 27 Jan, with his thanks to all who had submitted modifications for incorporation in the text. Both may be viewed at http://www.simpol.org/dossiers/dossier-UK/html-UK/aims_scope-UK.html

§ ISPO’s application for co-funding the professionally managed Cross-Frontier Poll of voters’ opinions on key SP issues in the UK and India was submitted to the Polden-Puckham Charitable Foundation in February. We expect to hear in May if this grant application is successful. 

§ Readers concerned about global trade in agricultural commodities will be interested to see the interview of ISPO’s Indian National Coordinator, Devinder Sharma, published in March in the online magazine Acres U.S.A. It is entitled ‘Food as a political weapon: international activist battles the tyranny of WTO’ and can be viewed at http://www.acresusa.com/magazines/archives/0304SharmaInterview.htm.

§ For campaigning on the Global Day of Action on 20 Mar, Syd Baumel (baumel@mts.net) circulated an A4-size leaflet headed Globalize Goodwill / Legislate Global Justice / Adopt the Simultaneous Policy and use your vote to Take Back the World (see http://www.simpol.org/dossiers/dossier-UK/pdf_UK/globalize_goodwill.html). This "could also be used as a poster", he writes. "There's room at the bottom to add local contact information …"

§ Also in March John Bunzl uploaded a revised Policy Proposalspage to the ISPO website (see 
http://www.simpol.org/dossiers/dossier-UK/html-UK/policy_proposal-UK.html. Feedback to jbunzl@simpol.org is welcome!

§ We heard recently that SP activists in Spain plan to register the address of their website as www.simpol.org.es. And Tim Anthony (tim-1@iname.com) in Canada has reserved the domain name ‘simpol-canada.org’. 

§ On 31 Mar the number of SP adopters worldwide had risen to 1153.


News from National SP Organisations (NSPOs)

Simpol-UK

Now it's official! Simpol-UK was incorporated on 22 March 2004

It was registered as a non-profit company limited by guarantee (no.5080159) at 27 London Road, Bromley, BR1 IDF, UK (address for legal purposes only). Patrick Andrews will serve as company secretary and be supported as directors by John Bunzl, Peter Challen, Stephen Eades and Brian Wills, who also become candidates for election as Trustees. And at the inaugural meetings held in London on 1 Apr the management functions were confirmed as follows:
 
Mike Brady: Local Groups Network Coord. John Bunzl: National Coordinator (caretaker)
Stephen Eades: Membership Officer Barnaby Flynn: Policy Coordinator
Tony Harvey: Man. Bd Secretary Dhevdhas Nair: Assisting John Bunzl
Jill Philips: without portfolio Josie Sawers: Simpol-UK webmaster
Steven Thorpe: Database Manager Brian Wills: Newsletter Editor

And soon SP promotional leaflets will be dropping though voters’ letterboxes

Under the guidance of Mike Brady (mikebrady@simpol.org.uk), the Simultaneous Policy Adopters’ Group (SPAG) in Cambridge is distributing an SP leaflet in the run-up to the European elections, due in June (contact Mike if you would like a master copy for your own use). The front page reads:

Had enough of politicians? At the European election why not VOTE for yourself? 

SP how to use democracy to put the people in charge.

And these lines appear on the back page above the cut-out section for signing and return:  Together we can swing elections to bring in the policies that will take back the world. There is no charge. Just adopt. SP is a long-term parallel strategy. Do what you can to promote global justice in your daily life and by supporting the campaigns of other organisations. But tick the SP Adopter box too, to help transform the way the world is run.  As a recent Mori poll in the UK "found that political apathy is so extreme that only about half (51%) of those questioned were certain to vote at the next general election and just 42% could name their MP", there’s a good chance that arresting words such as VOTE for yourself may stimulate jaded political interests. "Less than a third (32%) were satisfied with the way their MPs did their job and .. 36% with the way parliament worked." So it’s no surprise the Electoral Commission chairman wrote: "The (poll) clearly demonstrates that people want to have a say in the way decisions are made and to feel reassured they are being listened to. Politicians at all levels must make that connection." (Sarah Hall in The Guardian, 25/03/04).

So watch this space for feedback on how ordinary people and candidates in an English country and university town react to their first contact with the SP message.

Campaigning roundup

§  Interest in setting up local Simultaneous Policy Adopters’ Groups continues to grow, with a meeting in March prompting activity in Bristol and Hereford.  Simpol-Reading was formed on 31 March with Maurice Adshead as Coordinator. See the temporary Local Group Network site at http://spdev.gn.apc.org/ for details. 

§ Guidelines on Setting up a SP Adopters’ Group have been drawn up and circulated by Mike Brady, accompanied by a self-explanatory form for signature: SP Adopters’ Group Officer’s Pledge. Suggestions about how to build a relationship with candidates are given in a leaflet entitled Elections and candidates, which includes a tear-off sheet headed Simultaneous Policy Pledge Form (for Political Candidates). And a folding A4-size leaflet and a T-shirt, both prominently inscribed How do you want your world to be? are now available from Mike for campaigning use. 

§  The Cambridge SP Adopters’ Group (CAMSPAG) policy forum on 7 Apr concerned ‘Food Security for All’ and was held jointly with the campaigning organisation Farmers’ Link. Previous policy forums have been held on ‘Making all trade Fair Trade’ and ‘Achieving Sustainable Energy Use’. These public events are helping to increase the number of adopters and have been attended by representatives of the Green Party and Liberal Democrats.

§ Josie Sawers (josie_sawers@hotmail.com), assisted by interested friends, has drafted an ‘aspirational’ view of the Simpol-UK website for Management Board discussion and approval. "It is envisaged that the core site will be launched and visible to the public", she writes, "whilst some of the more complex features are developed later ... in such a way as not to impact the structure and navigation after the launch". It will be based on the domain address www.simpol.org.uk, already secured. Her draft provides brief data about web hosting, the site’s goals, the six target audiences and information on how the site is organised and navigated; it also displays six ‘zone landing pages’ and ends with 75 associated linked pages that may eventually be deployed. And, to provide for its possible use by other NSPOs, there is a transferable template that follows that excellent principle: "Design once; use anywhere".

§ In pursuing the Sustainability-Plus project, Brian Wills is interacting with Francis Irving of Public Whip (www.publicwhip.org.uk) in defining what criteria a ‘Dream MP’ in Westminster might use in supporting Simpol-UK interests. The objective, through Public Whip software, is to provide data derived from voting patterns and parliamentary questions on which MPs are most likely to support ‘SP’ measures. Currently, under the heading Supports measures promoting: this MP profile identifies 13 sustainability-related items (eg fair trade, debt relief …) and the heading Seeks to reform: lists the EU Common Agricultural Policy, international monetary systems, intellectual property rights, and the World Trade Organisation. The plan is to refine this list over time, and to supplement it with the names of MPs who are known to have supported SP-related Early Day Motions.

Other NSPOs

To avoid possible omissions in scanning SP lists, the plan is to open this section to contributions submitted by National Coordinators and others, as and when there’s news to share. Candidate items are therefore welcome up to around mid-June 2004, when compilation of the next issue will begin.


End-piece: disclaimers and letters

Your editor apologises in advance if errors have crept into this Newsletter: ça arrive, as they say in the country where he lives. But don’t hesitate to request corrections if they are necessary. And, of course, do write a Letter to the Editor if you want to comment on items in this issue. Or consider that something important has been overlooked. Or feel that It’s Simpol! is the ideal space for sharing new ideas with other adopters … 

Back to the ISPO website